A meeting of the Senate of Acadia University
occurred
on Monday, 9 January 2006, beginning at
4:04 p.m. with Chair Ian Wilks presiding and 44
members present.
1) Minutes of the Meeting of |
It was moved by R. Raeside and seconded by H. Hopkins that the minutes of H. Hopkins made an addition to Item 4)c), MOTION WAS CARRIED AS AMENDED |
2) Announcements
and Communications a) From the Chair -re Regrets -re Visitors -re Agenda |
Regrets were received from G. Dinter-Gottlieb, A. Irving, J. Masterson, S. Phillips, and A. Smith. Guests in attendance at this meeting were: S. Donovan of the VP (Academic) Office, M. Hopkins of the School of Music, and G. Daborn of the Academy of the Environment. The Chair noted that there was one handout for today's meeting: From the Acting Dean, Research and Graduate Studies - two notices of motion regarding the Strategic Plan on |
c) From the Vice-President (Academic) |
R. Nilson wished Senators all the best in the New Year. He advised that the ad hoc Senate Committee on the Proposed Strategic Plan has met once to date and planned to have a report available by the end of January. He extended congratulations to R. Perrins on his appointment as Dean, Faculty of Arts beginning R. Nilson reminded Senators that the submission deadline for the Teaching Innovation and Improvement Fund is |
3) Business
Arising From the Minutes a) Ad hoc Committee on Students with Learning Disabilities (056-22-SLD) |
It was moved by A. Quéma and seconded by B. Matthews that Senate create an ad hoc committee on students with learning disabilities as described in the notice of motion given at the That an ad hoc committee of Senate be struck and be given the following mandate: ∙ To examine current policies and practices regarding students with learning disabilities at Acadia with the view to making recommendations for improvement or modifications. In examining these policies and practices, the committee should consult Senate's Timetable, Instruction, and Examination Committee, the coordinator of Academic Support Programs, and the Equity Officer. ∙ To address Senate's concerns about issues of discrimination, learning accommodation, equity, and academic standards. ∙ To consult broadly with members of the University to take account of the fact that different schools and departments have different policies to address the issue of learning disabilities. ∙ The membership of the committee will include: - three Senators - one from each of the Faculty of Arts, the Faculty of Professional Studies, and the Faculty of Pure and Applied Science - two student representatives who participated in the panel on learning disabilities organized on - one student Senator - one representative from the - the ∙ To report to Senate by A friendly amendment to add the Dean of Students to the membership of this committee was accepted. Much discussion was held regarding the need for a representative "from the A second friendly amendment was accepted under the membership bullet, regarding the three Senators. It was amended to read "three Senators - one from the Faculty of Arts, the Faculty of Professional Studies, and the Faculty of Pure and Applied Science. R. Wilson said that the MOTION WAS CARRIED AS AMENDED. The Chair noted that the Senate Nominating Committee would now select the members for this ad hoc committee. |
4) New Business a) Research & Graduate Studies - Honorary Research Associate Designation (056-23-RGS) |
It was moved by W. Bedingfield and seconded by J. Gould that the designation of "Honorary Research Associate" be eliminated. G. Daborn said the loss of this designation would be felt by the Estuarine Center; however, was assured by W. Bedingfield that the center or any department could continue any community relationship on its own, rather than as a University designation. She felt that the establishment of University privileges, the co-supervising of a graduate degree, or the opportunity to collaborate on a research grant were areas that the R&GS Office could negotiate; but, in supervising students in undergraduate degrees, finding placements, etc. these areas belong in the purview of the faculty in the department involved. G. Daborn asked: "Is there any reason why a person should not be appointed as an Adjunct Professor in more than one department or unit in this University, including such centers as the W. Bedingfield noted that there are currently 2 to 4 HRA designations only, as most expired in 2005. MOTION WAS CARRIED. |
b) Research & Graduate Studies - Graduate Curriculum Changes - Education (056-24-RGS) |
It was moved by H. Hemming and seconded by H. Wyile that the graduate curriculum changes for the H. Hemming noted that the entry for EDUC 4163 should be deleted from this document as this is not a graduate course and would be considered in the undergraduate changes to be brought forward by the Curriculum Committee later in the agenda. MOTION WAS CARRIED. |
Environmental Science & Applied Geomatics (056-25-RGS) |
It was moved by G. Iwama and seconded by S. Bondrup-Nielsen that the graduate curriculum includes a new program for Environmental Science & Applied Geomatics as attached to today's agenda be approved. S. Bondrup-Nielsen spoke to this motion and noted that this is a proposed new program from Biology/Geology and is a masters program in conjunction with the R. Raeside confirmed that students in this program will be enrolled in both NSCC and Minor typing corrections were noted. MOTION WAS CARRIED. |
4) c) Research
& Graduate Studies - Proposed Strategic Research Plan (056-26-RGS) - Revisions to Above (056-46-RGS) |
As per APPENDIX A, it was moved by W. Bedingfield and seconded by A. Quéma that 1) the proposed Strategic Research Plan be approved by the Senate with the condition that the Senate Committee on Research and Graduate Studies design an ongoing, consultative process to review and update the plan, such process to take effect within 12 months and 2) the following revisions be accepted to this document: ● p2, paragraph 5, line 9: delete 'relatively small' and replace with 'growing'. ● p6, paragraph 4, line 12: delete 'their diverse knowledge bases, cultures, and value systems,'. ● p7, paragraph 2, line 2: insert 'education,' following the word 'religion'. ● p8, paragraph 5, line 14: change 'chilDR.en' to 'children'. ● p11, paragraph 2, line 2: insert 'and quality' following prior to 'of applications'. ● p11, paragraph 3, line 7: delete 'PhDs', insert 'doctoral studies'. W. Bedingfield spoke to this motion and noted that this document has the approval of the SCRGS. She said this document had its basis in the Institutional Research Plan of 2000, which was reviewed by an ad hoc committee this last year and this is the result. The following points were made as a result of open discussion of this motion: ● "support knowledge transfer" was described as collaborating with a community group for research, knowledge, etc. ● "mobile computing environment" was defined as "using laptops" It was moved by S. Enman said this amendment would open the way for research by the faculty of the W. Bedingfield felt this document should represent established strength, rather than emerging strength, which she believed this change was. Ongoing monitoring of this document would result in changes such as this. Much discussion followed. MOTION TO AMEND WAS DEFEATED. 20/18 The following friendly amendment was accepted: Pg. 4, second bullet under "Major Research Themes" to read in part "....and is critical during this period of significant socio-political, organizational, and economic transition...." In reply to a question, W. Bedingfield said there is more detail available under "Assessment of the Plan", but space was limited in this document. ORIGINAL MOTION WAS CARRIED. |
d) Curriculum Committee - Faculty of Arts (056-27 to 34-CRE) |
It was moved by B. Matthews and seconded by H. Wyile that the curriculum changes, as attached to today's agenda, for the Faculty of Arts be approved. Minor corrections were noted. MOTION WAS CARRIED. |
Faculty of Pure
and Applied Science (056-35 to 41-CRE) |
It was moved by G. Iwama and seconded by S. Bondrup-Nielsen that the curriculum changes, as attached to today's agenda, for the Faculty of Pure and Applied Science be approved. Minor corrections were noted. MOTION WAS CARRIED. |
Faculty of Professional Studies (056-41 to 44-CRE) |
It was moved by It was confirmed by the Registrar that the deletions made by the MOTION WAS CARRIED. |
e) University Learning Commons Steering Committee (056-45-LER) |
It was moved by R. Nilson and seconded by R. Perrins that the Senate nominate and elect, at the meeting of Senate to be held 9 January 2006, one faculty Senator from each of the Faculty of Arts, Faculty of Professional Studies, and Faculty of Pure and Applied Science to sit on the Acadia University Learning Commons Steering Committee. R. Nilson spoke to this motion. He said that it was time to establish the Learning Commons, which will support four Centers (Curriculum, Teaching & Learning; Internationalization; Civic Engagement; and Student Support [or Enrichment]). A steering committee is now required to provide guidance in the establishment of the Learning Commons and to address the various issues that are necessary within the context of the Learning Commons. It is important that the steering committee represent the academic Senate on campus. Each of the Centers will be co-chaired by a faculty member, but this motion would be a means to report back to Senate on the various developments in the Learning Commons and provide the opportunity for dialogue back and forth. A friendly amendment was accepted to identify which three faculties would be represented. In reply to a question, R. Nilson said the nominations were coming through the Senate, rather than the Faculty Council, to expedite proceedings. MOTION WAS CARRIED. |
f) Senate Representatives on University Learning Commons Steering Committee (056-47-LER) |
G. Ness nominated S. Markham-Starr; B. Matthews nominated P. Abela; The Chair called for further nominations three times and hearing none declared P. Abela and R. Raeside appointed by acclamation. A vote by ballot was held for the third position, resulting in H. Hemming appointed. The Chair noted that it was the duty of those members (P. Abela, R. Raeside, and H. Hemming) to represent the academic objects of Senate on this University committee and report back to Senate when they deem it appropriate to do so and to give the assurance that this Steering Committee is acting in accordance with Senate's general sense of how educational policy should unfold at this University. |
P. Cabilio asked if the April 2006 meeting could be held earlier in the
day, as the scheduled meeting date is a study day. The request was noted and will be addressed at the next
meeting. |
|
4) Adjournment |
P. Cabilio moved this meeting be adjourned. It was |